The choice of general anesthetic for electrophysiological interventions on heart
Abstract
Introduction: One of the most common methods of treating arrhythmias is catheter ablation of the heart. A relevant issue is the choice of an anesthetic aid and a specific drug for anesthesia, taking into account the effect of anesthetics on hemodynamics and their possible arrhythmogenic effect.
Objective: to evaluate the benefits and limitations of various anesthesia techniques applied in catheter ablation procedures, according to data from the scientific literature.
Materials and methods: in this literature review we analyzed 37 scientific articles published in the open-access PubMed database from 2000 to 2025, focusing on anesthesia techniques used during catheter ablation of the heart — general anesthesia (GA), deep sedation (DS) and conscious sedation (CS).
Results: many researches demonstrate that GA/DS improve procedural success, reduce ablation time, and lower recurrence rates while maintaining comparable safety to CS. The benefits of GA/DS are attributed to better catheter stability and precision. The choice of anesthetics considers their hemodynamic and arrhythmogenic effects. Propofol is effective for DS but requires monitoring due to risks of hypotension and respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine minimizes respiratory complications but may cause bradycardia. Benzodiazepines and opioids are suitable for moderate sedation, though their combination increases respiratory depression risks.
Conclusion: GA/DS is recommended for complex procedures (e.g., AF ablation), ensuring better outcomes, while CS may be used for simpler interventions. The choice of anesthetic should be tailored to the patient’s condition and procedural requirements.
Keywords
About the Author
Andrey A. VedernikovRussian Federation
Andrey A. Vedernikov - MD, Senior Researcher, Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care
27, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya Street, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Virani S.S., Alonso A., Benjamin E.J. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139-e596. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757
2. Silva R., Miranda C.M., Liu T. et al. Atrial fibrillation and risk of dementia: epidemiology, mechanisms, and effect of anticoagulation. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019;13:18. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00018
3. January C.T., Wann L.S., Calkins H. et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125-e151. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665
4. Morillo C.A., Verma A., Connolly S. et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2). JAMA. 2014;311 (7):692-700. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.467
5. Gaitan B.D., Trentman T.L., Fassett S.L., Mueller G.T. Sedation and analgesia in the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2011;25(4):647-659. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.11.006
6. Tang R.B., Dong J.Z., Zhao W.D. et al. Unconscious sedation/analgesia with propofol versus conscious sedation with fentanyl/midazolam for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Chinese Medical Journal. 2007;120(22):2036-2038.
7. Yamaguchi T., Shimakawa Y., Mitsumizo S., et al. Feasibility of total intravenous anesthesia by cardiologists with the support of anesthesiologists during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiology. 2018;72(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.12.008
8. Committee on Quality Management and Departmental Administration. Continuum of Depth of Sedation: Definition of general anesthesia and levels of sedation/analgesia. American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2021.
9. King K.P. Where is the line between deep sedation and general anesthesia? American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002;97 (10):2485-2486. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.06047.x
10. Lu F., Lin J., Benditt D.G. Conscious sedation and anesthesia in the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2013;24(2):237-245. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12001
11. Garcia R., Waldmann V., Vanduynhoven P. et al. World-wide sedation strategies for atrial fibrillation ablation. EP Europace. 2021;23(12):2039-2045. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab154
12. Di Biase L., Conti S., Mohanty P. et al. General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(3):368-372. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.043
13. Martin C.A., Curtain J.P., Gajendragadkar P.R. et al. Improved outcome and cost effectiveness in ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation under general anaesthetic. EP Europace. 2018;20(6):935-942. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux057
14. Bun S.S., Latcu D.G., Allouche E. et al. General anesthesia is not superior to local anesthesia for remote magnetic ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2015;38(3):391-397. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12533
15. Xu J.J, Gao L.J., Chang D. Clinical characteristics and outcome comparison between atrial fibrillation patients underwent catheter ablation under general anesthesia or local anesthesia and sedation. Zhonghua Xinxueguanbing Zazhi. 2017;45(11):935-939. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.11.008
16. Malcolme-Lawes L.C., Lim P.B., Koa-Wing M. et al. Robotic assistance and general anaesthesia improve catheter stability during atrial fibrillation ablation. EP Europace. 2013;15(1):41-47. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus244
17. Chikata A., Kato T., Yaegashi T. et al. General anesthesia improves contact force and reduces gap formation in pulmonary vein isolation. Heart and Vessels. 2017;32(8):997- 1005. DOI:10.1007/s00380-017-0961-z
18. Hummel J.D., Elsayed-Awad H. Walking the tightrope between deep sedation and general anesthesia. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2011;22(12):1344-1345. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02151.x
19. Li K., Sang T., Chan C. et al. Anaesthesia use in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Heart Asia. 2019;11(2):e011155. Published 2019 Aug 14. DOI:10.1136/heartasia-2018-011155
20. Pang N., Gao J., Zhang N. et al. Comparison of the Different Anesthesia Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiol Res Pract. 2022;2022:1124372. DOI:10.1155/2022/1124372
21. Kumar S., Morton J.B., Halloran K. et al. Effect of respiration on catheter-tissue contact force during ablation of atrial arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(7):1041-1047
22. Kautzner J., Neuzil P., Lambert H. et al. Efficas II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(8):1229-1235. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv057
23. Jarman J.W., Panikker S., Das M. et al. Relationship between contact force sensing technology and medium-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2015;26(4):378-384 DOI: 10.1111/jce.12606
24. Burjorjee J.E., Milne B. Propofol for electrical storm; a case report of cardioversion and suppression of ventricular tachycardia by propofol. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:973–7. DOI:10.1007/BF03016886
25. Miró O., de la Red G., Fontanals J. Cessation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during acute intravenous propofol administration. Anesthesiology 2000;92:910 DOI:10.1097/00000542-200003000-00061
26. Mulpuru S.K., Patel D.V., Wilbur S.L. et al. Electrical storm and termination with propofol therapy: a case report. Int J Cardiol 2008;128:e6–8. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.05.052
27. Doi A., Satomi K., Makimoto H. et al. Efficacy of additional radiofrequency applications for spontaneous dissociated pulmonary vein activity after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013;24:894–901. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12153
28. Narui R., Matsuo S., Isogai R. et al. Impact of deep sedation on the electrophysiological behavior of pulmonary vein and non-PV firing during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2017;49:51–7. DOI:10.1007/s10840-017-0238-6
29. Tang H.S., Dong Z., Zhao W.Q. et al. Unconscious sedation/analgesia with propofol versus conscious sedation with fentanyl/midazolam for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Chin Med J.2007;120(22):2036-2038
30. Kottkamp H., Hindricks G., Eitel C. et al. Deep sedation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective study in 650 consecutive patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(12): 1339-1343. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02171.x
31. Salukhe T.V., Willems S., Drewitz I. et al. Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists without assisted ventilation for long cardiac interventions: an assessment of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2012;14(3):325-330. DOI:10.1093/europace/eur371
32. Cho J.S., Shim J.K., Na S. et al. Improved sedation with dexmedetomidine-remifentanil compared with midazolamremifentanil during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled trial. *Europace.* 2014;16(7):1000-1006. DOI:10.1093/europace/euu020
33. Sairaku A., Yoshida Y., Hirayama H. et al. Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine during ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. Europace.2014;16(7):994-999. DOI:10.1093/europace/euu019
34. Pugh P.J., Spurrell P., Kamalvand K. Sulke A.N. Sedation by physician with diazepam for DC cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. Heart. 2001;86(5):572-573. DOI:10.1136/heart.86.5.572
35. Mitchell A.R., Chalil S., Boodhoo L. et al. Diazepam or midazolam for external DC cardioversion (the DORM Study). Europace. 2003;5(4):391-395. DOI:10.1016/S1099-5129(03)00077-3
36. Notarstefano P., Pratola C., Toselli T. Ferrari R. Sedation with midazolam for electrical cardioversion. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007;30(5):608-611. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00720.x
37. Kalogridaki M., Souvatzis X., Mavrakis H.E. et al. Anaesthesia for cardioversion: a prospective randomised comparison of propofol and etomidate combined with fentanyl. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011;52(6):483-488
Review
For citations:
Vedernikov A.A. The choice of general anesthetic for electrophysiological interventions on heart. Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;1(3):43-51. (In Russ.)
