Analysis of structural and anatomical features of the mitral valve using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Abstract
Introduction: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited myocardial disorder. In a significant proportion of patients with obstructive HCM, abnormalities of the papillary muscles (PM) are a key contributor to dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, beyond septal hypertrophy alone. Surgical papillary muscle reorientation is a targeted method for correcting this pathology.
Aim: to perform a comprehensive analysis of the structural and anatomical features of the mitral valve (MV) and subvalvular apparatus using cardiac CTA and MRI in patients with obstructive HCM to identify candidates for PM reorientation and to compare their characteristics and short-term outcomes with patients undergoing standard surgical procedures.
Materials and Methods: a prospective single-center study included 102 patients with obstructive HCM, divided into groups: Group 1 (n=75/102) – patients undergoing isolated myectomy; within this group, a subgroup, Group 2 (n=19/75) underwent concomitant PM reorientation in addition to myectomy; Group 3 (n=27/102) – patients undergoing myectomy with MV repair/replacement. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation, including echocardiography, CTA, and MRI, to assess MV, PM, and subvalvular apparatus morphology.
Results: patients in Group 2 were characterized by significantly lower basal septal thickness (1.6 ± 0.3 cm vs. 2.1 ± 0.4 cm; p<0.001), the presence of bifid PMs (100% vs. 21.7–38.5%; p<0.001), and a greater anterolateral PM mobility angle (14.5° ± 2.0° vs. 9.5° ± 2.5°; p<0.001). ROC analysis showed high predictive value for an anterolateral PM mobility angle >12.5° (AUC=0.891) and the presence of bifid PMs (AUC=0.892) in selecting candidates for reorientation. The combination of these features provided a sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 88.5%. Postoperatively, the reorientation group achieved the lowest LVOT gradient (9.5 ± 6.3 mm Hg vs. 15.2 ± 8.5; p=0.004) with no need for permanent pacemaker implantation (0% vs. 11.2%; p<0.05).
Conclusions: multimodal imaging identifies a specific phenotype of obstructive HCM where PM abnormalities are the primary substrate for LVOT obstruction. PM reorientation is an effective and safe surgical treatment for selected patients, relieving obstruction with a low risk of complications.
About the Authors
O. Yu. DariyRussian Federation
Olga Yu. Dariy – MD, PhD, Radiologist of the Radiology Department
27 Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya str., Moscow, 117997
I. Yu. Baryshnikova
Russian Federation
Irina Yu. Baryshnikova – MD, PhD, Head of department of ultrasound innovation decision in pediatrician
135 Rublevskoe shosse, Moscow, 121552
I. Y. Klimchuk
Russian Federation
Igor Ya. Klimchuk – MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Surgeon
135 Rublevskoe shosse, Moscow, 121552
M. K. Sanakoev
Russian Federation
Merab K. Sanakoev – MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Researcher at the Department of Surgical Treatment of Interactive Pathology
135 Rublevskoe shosse, Moscow, 121552
E. V. Kondratev
Russian Federation
Evgeny V. Kondratyev – MD, PhD, Head of Radiology department
27 Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya str., Moscow, 117997
L. A. Bokeria
Russian Federation
Leo A. Bokeria – аcademician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, PhD, President
135 Rublevskoe shosse, Moscow, 121552
References
1. Maron B.J. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(11):1320–1330.
2. Ho C.Y., Day S.M., Ashley E.A., et al. Genotype and lifetime burden of disease in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insights from the Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry (SHaRe). Circulation. 2015;132(2):138–148.
3. Lopes L.R., Aung N., van Duijvenboden S., Munroe P.B., Elliott P.M., Petersen S.E. Prevalence of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the UK Biobank Population. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jul 1;6(7):852-854
4. Elliott P.M., Anastasakis A., Borger M.A., Borggrefe M., Cecchi F., et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2733–2779.
5. Ommen S.R., Mital S., Burke M.A., et al. 2020 AHA/ACC guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):e159–e240.
6. O'Mahony C., Jichi F., Pavlou M., Monserrat L., Anastasakis A., Rapezzi C., Biagini E., Gimeno J.R., Limongelli G., McKenna W.J., Omar R.Z., Elliott P.M. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Outcomes Investigators. A novel clinical risk prediction model for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM risk-SCD). Eur Heart J. 2014 Aug 7;35(30):2010-20
7. Dariy O.Y., Yurpolskaya L.A., Rychina I.E., Dorofeev A.V., Golukhova E.Z. Diagnostic capabilities of cardiac computed tomography in the preoperative diagnosis of hypertrophic car-diomyopathy. Digital Diagnostics. 2024; 5(3): 467-479 DOI: 10.17816/DD629141 [In Russ].
8. Kwon D.H., Smedira N.G., Thamilarasan M., Lytle B.W., Lever H., Desai M.Y. Characteristics and surgical outcomes of symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with abnormal papillary muscle morphology undergoing papillary muscle reorientation. J ThoracCardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140:317–324.
9. Harrigan C.J., Appelbaum E., Maron B.J. ,Buros J.L. Significance of papillary muscle abnormalities identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy et al. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101:668–673.
10. Patel P., Dhillon A., Popovic Z.B., Smedira N.G., Rizzo Jet. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients without severe septal hypertrophy: implications of mitral valve and papillary muscle abnormalities assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8:e003132
Review
For citations:
Dariy O.Yu., Baryshnikova I.Yu., Klimchuk I.Y., Sanakoev M.K., Kondratev E.V., Bokeria L.A. Analysis of structural and anatomical features of the mitral valve using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;1(4):8-17. (In Russ.)
