Preview

Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery

Advanced search

A clinical case of aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis implanted in the ≪full-root≫ technique

Abstract

Aim: to present the results of surgical treatment of a patient with a narrow fibrous ring of the aortic valve by replacing it with a frameless prosthesis

Material and methods: this article discusses a clinical case of aortic valve replacement with a frameless Freestyle Medtronic prosthesis using the "full root" technique in a patient with a narrow fibrous ring and severe stenosis. According to the results of Echo before surgery, the diameter of the fibrous ring of the aortic valve was 17 mm, the maximum gradient on the valve was 119 mm Hg, average 68 mm Hg, valve opening - 5 mm, effective orifice area - 0.5 cm2. According to coronary angiography, stenosis at the mouth of the left coronary artery (LCA) was 75%.

Results: the patient underwent aortic valve and aortic root replacement with a Medtronic Freestyle 19 mm biological prosthesis using the "full-root" technique, and left coronary artery trunk replacement with a Uni-Graft 6 mm prosthesis using the Svensson technique under artificial circulation and cold cardioplegia with Custodiol solution. In the postoperative period, the maximum gradient was 12 mm Hg, the average was 5 mm Hg. The patient was discharged in a stable condition without clinical signs of heart failure

Conclusion: using a frameless biological prosthesis with the «full-root» implantation technique in a patient with critical aortic valve stenosis and an ascending aorta diameter of 20 mm, we achieved the best hemodynamic result. The additional time required for this technique of implantation of frameless prostheses compared to implantation of pericardial framed valves does not affect early clinical results and may be rewarded with better mid- and long-term results. The presented technique does not have a negative effect on early morbidity or mortality and can be recommended for use in patients with a combination of severe aortic valve stenosis and a narrow aortic root.

About the Authors

S. A. Petko
FSBI «National Medical Research Center named after A.V. Vishnevsky» of the Ministry of Health
Russian Federation

Semen A. Petko - M.D, cardiovascular surgeon at the Department of Cardiac Surgery №2

27, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya St., Moscow, 117997



M. G. Gasangusenov
FSBI «National Medical Research Center named after A.V. Vishnevsky» of the Ministry of Health
Russian Federation

Magomed G. Gasangusenov - MD, cardiovascular surgeon at the Department of Cardiac Surgery №2

27, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya St., Moscow, 117997



M. M. Anishchenko
FSBI «National Medical Research Center named after A.V. Vishnevsky» of the Ministry of Health
Russian Federation

Maksim M. Anishchenko - MD, Ph., cardiovascular surgeon at the Department of Cardiac Surgery № 2

27, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya St., Moscow, 117997



E. S. Malyshenko
FSBI «National Medical Research Center named after A.V. Vishnevsky» of the Ministry of Health
Russian Federation

Egor S. Malyshenko - MD, Head of the Department of Cardiac Surgery №1

27, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya St., Moscow, 117997



V. A. Popov
FSBI «National Medical Research Center named after A.V. Vishnevsky» of the Ministry of Health; FSBEI «Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RMACPE)
Russian Federation

Vadim A. Popov - MD, PhD, Professor, Chief of the Cardiovascular Surgery Division; Professor at the Department of Angiology, Cardiovascular, Endovascular Surgery and Arrhythmology n.a. ac. A.V. Pokrovsky

27, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya St., Moscow, 117997

2/11, Barrikadnaya St., Moscow, 125993



A. Sh. Revishvili
FSBI «National Medical Research Center named after A.V. Vishnevsky» of the Ministry of Health; FSBEI «Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RMACPE)
Russian Federation

Amiran Sh. Revishvili - MD, PhD, Professor, Director; Head of the Department of Angiology, Cardiovascular, Endovascular Surgery and Arrhythmology n.a. ac. A.V. Pokrovsky

27, Bolshaya Serpukhovskaya St., Moscow, 117997

2/11, Barrikadnaya St., Moscow, 125993



References

1. Астапов Д.А., Демидов Д. П., Семенова Е. И. и др. Протезирование аортального клапана каркасными и бескаркасными биологическими протезами: промежуточный анализ результатов. Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова.2017; 176( 4): 12-17. DOI: 10.24884/0042-4625-2017-176-4-12-17

2. Tavakoli R., Jamshidi P., Gassmann M. Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots. J Vis Exp. 2017; (123): 55632. doi: 10.3791/55632. DOI: 10.3791%2F55632

3. Rahimtoola S.H. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978;58(1): 20-24. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.58.1.20

4. Stefanellia G., Pirroa F., Olarua A. et al. Long-term outcomes using the stentless LivaNova-Sorin Pericarbon FreedomTM valve after aortic valve replacement Weltertb Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2018;116–123 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy012

5. Doty D.B., Cafferty A., Kon N.D. et al. Medtronic Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis: Implant techniques. J Card Surg. 1998; 13(5): 369-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1998.tb01099.x

6. Malyshenko E.S., Petko S.A., Popov V.A. et al. Videoassistedthoracoscopic redo sternotomy forprimary dysfunction of the aortic root homograft:a case report. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya ikardiokhirurgiya = Circulation Pathology and-Cardiac Surgery. 2022;26(3):91-96. DOI: 10.21688/1681-3472-2022-3-91-96

7. Lazuta S.S., Spiridonov S.V. Options for surgical treatment of aortic valve defects in patients with a narrow fibrous ring. Journal of GrSMU.2021; 17(6): 630-6. DOI: 10.25298/2221-8785-2019-17-6-630-636 [In Russ].

8. Kwasny L.B., Bianco R.W., Toledo-Pereyra L.H. History of heart valve repair. Heart valves. From Design to Clinical Implantation Boston : Springer US, 2013. 85-120 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6144-9_5

9. Tarasoutchi F. Prosthesis-Patient MismatchFollowing Aortic Valve Replacement: FindingPredictors for Prevention. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 114(1): 23-24. DOI: 10.36660%2Fabc.201907

10. Domoto S., Niinami H., Uwabe K. et al. Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016; 22(1): 19-25. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv284

11. He G.W., Acuff T.E., Ryan W.H. et al. Aortic valve replacement: determinants of operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994; 57(5): 1140-6. DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91344-7

12. Kanwar A., Thaden J.J., Nkomo V.T. Management of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018; 93(4): 488-508. DOI: /10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.01.020

13. Nair S.K., Sundar R. Mitral and aortic annular enlargement. J Card Surg. 1994 ; 9(2): 131. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1994.tb00839.x

14. Муратов Р.М., Титов Д.А., Казумян Б.В. и др. Техника аортовентрикулопластики Конно в клапанном и субклапанном типах обструкция оттока левого желудочка. Торакальная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2016; 58 (5): 312-315

15. Marathe S.P., Chavez M., Sleeper L.A. et al. Modified Ozaki Procedure Including Annular Enlargement for Small Aortic Annuli in Young Patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 110(4): 1364-1371. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.025

16. Kadyraliev B.K., Arutyunyan V.B., Chernov I.I. et al. Neocuspidization of the aortic valve.Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya Circulation Pathology and Cardiac Surgery. 2021;25(2):1118. DOI: 10.21688/1681-3472-2021-2-11-18 [In Russ].

17. Chernov I.I., Kozmin D.Yu., Makeev S.A. et al. Immediate results of modified Ross procedure. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya I kardiokhirurgiya. 2016;20(1):12-18. DOI: 10.21688/1681-3472-2016-1-12-18[In Russ].

18. Enginoev S.T., Kondratiev D.A., Zenkov A.A. et al. Pulmonary homograft dysfunction after Rossprocedure in adults: a single center experience. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;27(8):4804. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4804 https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4804 [In Russ].

19. Ferrari E., Franciosi G., Clivio S. et al. Stent valve implantation in conventional redo aortic valve surgery to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg.2017; 24(3): 319-323. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivw397

20. Albert A., Florath I., Rosendahl U., et al. Effectof surgeon on transprosthetic gradients afteraortic valve replacement with Freestyle® stentlessbioprosthesis and its consequences: A follow-upstudy in 587 patients. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 2:40. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-2-40

21. Ennker J., Albert A., Florath I. Medtronic stentless Freestyle® porcine aortic valve replacement. In: Yankah, C.A., Weng, Y., Hetzer, R. (eds) Aortic Root Surgery. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7985-1869-8_26

22. Ennker J., Meilwes M., Pons-Kuehnemann J.et al. Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve therapy: 17-year clinical results. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2016; 24(9): 868-874. DOI: 10.1177/0218492316675244

23. Muratov R.M., Lazarev R.A., Krestinich I.M. etal. Aortic valve replacement with the MedtronicFreestyle prosthesis using a single-row subcoronarytechnique: surgical technique and mid-term results.Grudnaya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2008;5:70-72 [In Russ].


Review

For citations:


Petko S.A., Gasangusenov M.G., Anishchenko M.M., Malyshenko E.S., Popov V.A., Revishvili A.Sh. A clinical case of aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis implanted in the ≪full-root≫ technique. Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;1(1):91-98. (In Russ.)

Views: 24


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.