Preview

Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery

Advanced search

Minimally invasive correction of mitral valve defects from right-sided minithoracotomy under ‘direct vision control’

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the immediate results of mitral defect correction from right sided lateral minithoracotomy.

Materials and Methods: From August 2021 to September 2023, 30 patients with mitral valve defects underwent surgical correction of mitral defect through right sided lateral minithoracotomy under direct visual control. The indications for the minimally invasive approach were the presence of mitral valve defect without concomitant coronary artery disease requiring revascularisation, absence of aortic insufficiency of more than 1 degree. Among the operated patients there were 19 (63,3%) women and 11 (36,7%) men. The mean age was 48.1±18.8 years. Body mass index was 24.8±6.3 kg/m. The insufficiency was a haemodynamic variant of the defect in 27 patients (90%).

Results: The mean volume of postoperative blood loss was 272±87 ml. The mean time on ALV was 8±3 hours. The mean time in the intensive care unit was 22.6±15.3 hours. There were no repeated interventions and transfusion of blood components in the group of operated patients. There was no hospital mortality, AMI and ACVA among the operated patients. There was no surgical site infection, lymphorrhoea. Pneumothorax requiring drainage was detected in one (3.3%) case. A first-time paroxysm of heart rhythm disturbance (atrial fibrillation/flutter) was recorded in 7 (23%) patients. The average time of hospital stay was 11,9±7 days.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive correction of mitral valve defects from right-sided minithoracotomy under direct visual control is a safe and reproducible operation. IV i/s access provides optimal visualisation of the mitral valve, allowing to perform the whole range of both reconstructive techniques and MV prosthetic repair without the use of video-assisted surgery. In case of proper selection of patients for this type of intervention, the operation is associated with a low incidence of complications in the perioperative period. Preservation of the thoracic cage framework, absence of complications associated with traditional access, and early activation of the patient, combined with an excellent cosmetic effect, contribute to a shorter hospital stay.

About the Authors

O. I. Kulumbegov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal center of the cardio vascular surgery under the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



E. E. Kobzev
Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal center of the cardio vascular surgery under the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



A. N. Kuznetsov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal center of the cardio vascular surgery under the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



I. A. Karpov
Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal center of the cardio vascular surgery under the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



E. V. Rosseikin
Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal center of the cardio vascular surgery under the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Khabarovsk



References

1. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg 1997;226:421-6 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199710000-00003

2. Detter C, Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H. Minimally invasive valve surgery: Different techniques and approaches. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2004;2:239-51 DOI: 10.1586/14779072.2.2.239

3. F.P. Casselman, S. Van Slycke, F. Wellens, et al., Mitral valve surgery can now routinely be performed endoscopically, Circulation 108 (Suppl. 1) (2003) II48– 54. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000087391.49121.ce

4. Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of acquired valvular heart disease. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30(9):962- 970. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.03.022

5. Iung, B.; Delgado, V.; Rosenhek, R.; Price, S.; Prendergast, B.; Wendler, O.; De Bonis, M.; Tribouilloy, C.; Evangelista, A.; Bogachev-Prokophiev, A.; et al. Contemporary Presentation and Management of Valvular Heart Disease: The EURObservational Research DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041080

6. Jiang Q, Wang Z, Guo J, et al. Retrospective Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Open Procedure for Mitral Valve Disease. J Investig Surg 2020 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1726531

7. Martínez-Sellés, M.; García-Fernández, M.A.; Moreno, M.; Larios, E.; García-Robles, J.A.; Pinto, A. Influencia del sexo en la etiología de la insuficiencia mitral [Influence of gender on the etiology of mitral regurgitation]. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2006, 59, 1335–1338. DOI: 10.1157/13096587

8. Mensah, G.A.; Roth, G.A.; Fuster, V. The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors: 2020 and Beyond. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 2529– 2532. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.009

9. Mihos CG, Santana O, Pineda AM, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy surgery for native mitral valve infective endocarditis. J Heart Valve Dis 2014;23:343-9.

10. Moscarelli M, Fattouch K, Gaudino M, et al. Minimal Access Versus Sternotomy for Complex Mitral Valve Repair: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109:737-44 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.034

11. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a populationbased study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2006;368(9540):1005-1011. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8

12. P. Modi, E. Rodriguez, C. Hargrove III, Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 34 (2008) 943–952. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.057

13. Paparella D, Fattouch K, Moscarelli M, et al. Current trends in mitral valve surgery: a multicenter national comparison between full-sternotomy and minimally-invasive approach. Int J Cardiol. 2020;306:147-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.137

14. Percy E, Hirji SA, Yazdchi F, et al. LongTerm Outcomes of Right Minithoracotomy Versus Hemisternotomy for Mitral Valve Repair. Innovations (Phila) 2020;15:74-80. DOI: 10.1177/1556984519891966

15. Robert B. Hawkins, J. Hunter Mehaffey, Samuel M. Kessel, Jolian J. Dahl, Irving L. Kron, John A. Kern, Leora T. Yarboro, Gorav Ailawadi. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with excellent resource utilization, cost, and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc SurgThoracic Surgery,Volume 156, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 611-616.e3, ISSN 0022-5223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.108

16. Santangelo, G.; Bursi, F.; Faggiano, A.; Moscardelli, S.; Simeoli, P.S.; Guazzi, M.; Lorusso, R.; Carugo, S.; Faggiano, P. The Global Burden of Valvular Heart Disease: From Clinical Epidemiology to Management. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2178. DOI:10.3390/jcm12062178

17. Van Praet KM, Stamm C, Sündermann SH, et al. Minimally invasive surgical mitral valve repair: State of the art review. Interv Cardiol 2018;13:14-9. DOI: 10.15420/icr.2017:30:1

18. Vo, A.T., Nguyen, D.H., Van Hoang, S. et al. Learning curve in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg 14, 213 (2019). DOI: 10.1186/s13019-019-1038-0.


Review

For citations:


Kulumbegov O.I., Kobzev E.E., Kuznetsov A.N., Karpov I.A., Rosseikin E.V. Minimally invasive correction of mitral valve defects from right-sided minithoracotomy under ‘direct vision control’. Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;3(1):44-51. (In Russ.)

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.