Immediate and midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MEDLAB CT polymeric heart valve
Abstract
Aim: To assess the immediate and mid-term outcomes of transapical and transfemoral aortic valve replacement using polymeric heart valve MedLAB CT.
Methods: A total of 319 patients with aortic valve disease admitted to the Federal Center for Cardiovascular Surgery (Penza) for elective cardiac surgery were enrolled in a prospective single-center study. The mean age of the patients was 73.3±4 years. All recruited patients were evaluated as high and medium risk for cardiac surgery with the mean EuroSCORE II of 6.27%. All surgeries were performed in a hybrid operating room under combined endotracheal anesthesia. The size of the valves was selected by the surgeon based on EchoCG findings, CT images of the aortic root, and intraoperative aortography. The endpoints were death from any cause and clinically significant cerebral stroke. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed according to echocardiography: the mean AV gradient, the effective orifice area, the severity of postoperative regurgitation.
Results: A total of 450 transapical and 8 transfemoral aortic valve replacement using polymeric heart valve MedLAB CT were performed. 29 (6%) patients died in the in-hospital period. Five (1%) patients had stroke. There were no cases of myocardial infarction. Acute kidney injury was diagnosed in eight (2%) patients. Eleven (2.4%) patients required pacemaker implantation. There were no cases of clinically significant aortic regurgitation in the early postoperative period. Four patients required repeat open aortic valve surgery within the same hospitalization. The mean AV gradient following surgery was 5.55±2.24, the peak – 11.29±4.46 mmHg. The effective orifice area was 2.27±0.60 cm². 80 patients died within the 8-years follow-up period. The mortality rate was 18.3% and the survival rate was 71.3% within 84 months.
Conclusion: The safety and effectiveness of the MedLAB CT polymeric heart valve prosthesis with PTFE leaflets are not inferior, but even superior in terms of several parameters to biological TAVR. TAVR via transapical and transfemoral access using MedLAB CT is a safe and effective procedure with favorable immediate and mid-term outcomes.
About the Authors
V. V. BazylevRussian Federation
Bazylev Vladlen V. - M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Medical Director.
6, Stasova St., Penza, 440071
A. B. Voevodin
Russian Federation
Voevodin Andrey B. - M.D., Ph.D., Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery.
6, Stasova St., Penza, 440071
A. A. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Kuznetsova Alena A. - M.D., cardiovascular surgeon.
6, Stasova St., Penza, 440071
M. P. Patel
Russian Federation
Patel Mihir P. - M.D., Ph.D. student, cardiovascular surgeon.
6, Stasova St., Penza, 440071
I. D. Potopalsky
Russian Federation
Potopalsky Ivan D. - M.D., Ph.D., cardiovascular surgeon.
6, Stasova St., Penza, 440071
V. A. Karnakhin
Russian Federation
Karnakhin Vadim A. - M.D., Ph.D., cardiovascular surgeon.
6, Stasova St., Penza, 440071
References
1. Lee G, Chikwe J, Milojevic M, Wijeysundera HC, Biondi-Zoccai G, Flather M, Gaudino MFL, Fremes SE, Tam DY. ESC/EACTS vs. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2023 Mar 7;44(10):796-812. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac803.
2. Webb JG, Blanke P, Meier D, Sathananthan J, Lauck S, Chatfield AG, Jelisejevas J, Wood DA, Akodad M. TAVI in 2022: Remaining issues and future direction. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Apr;115(4):235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2022.04.001.
3. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 33(19):2451-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs109.
4. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology.American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:e57–185.
5. Bazylev VV, Voevodin барохAB, Shalygina AS. Medium-term results of transcatheter implantation of MedLab-CT aortic valve prosthesis. Rus J Cardiol. 2019; 24 (8): 65–69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/15604071-2019-8-65-69
6. Bazylev VV, Voyevodin AB, Zakharova AS, Rosseykin EV. Early clinical and hemodynamic results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the “MedLab-KT” prosthesis. Circulation Pathol Cardiac Surg. 2018; 22 (3): 17–24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21688-1681-3472-2018-3-17-24
7. Baumgartner, H.; Falk, V.; Bax, J.J.; De Bonis, M.; Hamm, C.; Holm, P.J.; Iung, B.; Lancellotti, P.; Lansac, E.; Rodriguez Muñoz, D.; et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 2739–2791.
8. Mack, M.J.; Leon, M.B.; Thourani, V.H.; Makkar, R.; Kodali, S.K.; Russo, M.; Kapadia, S.R.; Malaisrie, S.C.; Cohen, D.J.; Pibarot, P.; et al. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in LowRisk Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1695–1705.
9. Ye, J.; Cheung, A.; Lichtenstein, S.V.; Carere, R.G.; Thompson, C.R.; Pasupati, S.; Webb, J.G. Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation in Humans. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006, 131, 1194–1196.
10. Schwarz F, Baumann P, Manthey J, Hoffmann M, Schuler G, Mehmel HC, Schmitz W, Kübler W. The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation. 1982;66(5):1105–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.66.5.1105.
11. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, PARTNER Trial Investigators, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–607.
12. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, PARTNER Trial Investigators, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2187–98.
13. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1609–20.
14. Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1706–15.
15. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, Makkar R, Kodali SK, Russo M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in lowrisk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1695–705.
16. Carroll JD, Mack MJ, Vemulapalli S, Herrmann HC, Gleason TG, Hanzel G, et al. STS-ACC TVT registry of Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2492–516.
17. Mori M, Gupta A, Wang Y, Vahl T, Nazif T, Kirtane AJ, et al. Trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement among older adults in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:2161–72.
18. Bazylev V., Voyevodin, A., Zakharova A., Rosseykin E. Early clinical and hemodynamic results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the “MedLab-KT” prosthesis. Patologiya Krovoobrashcheniya I Kardiokhirurgiya. 2018;22(3): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2018-3-17-24
19. D'Onofrio A, Tessari C, Tarantini G, Cibin G, Lorenzoni G, Pesce R, Fraccaro C, Napodano M, Gregori D, Gerosa G. Transapical TAVI: Survival, Hemodynamics, Devices and Machine Learning. Lessons Learned After 10-Year Experience. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Aug;48(8):101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101734.
20. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR, et al., PARTNER trial investigators. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385:2477–2484.
21. Koliastasis L, Doundoulakis I, Kokkinidis DG, Milkas A, Drakopoulou M, Benetos G, Latsios G, Synetos A, Aggeli K, Tousoulis D, Tsioufis K, Toutouzas K. TAVI with the ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve in special populations: A systematic review. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 Jul-Aug;66:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2022.04.005.
22. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve я replacement with a selfexpanding prosthesis N Engl J Med 2014; 370 (19): 1790–8
23. Sabaté M, Cánovas S, García E et al. In-hospital and mid-term predictors of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: data from the TAVI National Registry 2010–2011. Rev Esp. Cardiol 2013; 66 (12): 949–58
24. Bagur R, Webb JG, Nietlispach F et al. Acute kidney injury following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictive factors, prognostic value, and comparison with surgical aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 865–74.
25. Elhmidi Y, Bleiziffer S, Piazza N et al. Incidence and predictors of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 735–9.
26. Nuis RJ, Van Mieghem NM, Tzikas A et al. Frequency, determinants, and prognostic effects of acute kidney injury and red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77: 881–9.
27. Imaev T.E., Komlev A.E., Saidova M.A. et al. 5-year experience with transcatheter aortic bioprosthetic valve implantation in Russian Cardiological ScientificIndustrial Complex of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Consilium Medicum. 2015; 17 (10): 67–72.
Review
For citations:
Bazylev V.V., Voevodin A.B., Kuznetsova A.A., Patel M.P., Potopalsky I.D., Karnakhin V.A. Immediate and midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MEDLAB CT polymeric heart valve. Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery. 2023;3(3):35-44. (In Russ.)